Robert P. Churchill CBAP, PMP, CSM, CSPO, CSD, CLSSBB Process Analysis for Business and Industry I can help you... Analyze and Document Your Process

Web-based Discrete-Event Simulation Framework

I'm currently building a modular, discrete-event simulation framework in JavaScript, that will ultimately be joined to a back end storage mechanism. This is appropriate to conduct many forms of process analysis, operations research, and As-Is / To-Be comparisons. The framework could be implemented in any language but I've chosen JavaScript because it makes for readily accessible demonstrations on the web.

The framework is built on my own implementation of a future events queue mechanism that processes events in time order and a current events queue mechanism that processes events of the form wait ... until (logical condition), where the logical condition can be any parameter or function that evaluates to true or false.

Development history and discussion

Git repo.

The ongoing To Do list for the project follows:

  • Review handling of arrival schedule and entry distribution arrays beyond period where they're defined
  • Standardize linking and exclusivity process
  • Resolve and standardize new vs. advance issue
  • Rework drawing of Path components so correct elements are always on top
  • New property for forward exclusivity as opposed to receiving exclusivity.
  • Formalize and implement method of receiving from multiple upstream components in turn. Implementing and observing this may illuminate the behaviors that will need to be implemented for the general path solution described in one or more previous posts.
  • Rework the Queue mechanism to flexibly handle finite-traversal time and zero-traversal time configurations
  • Revisit distribution logic to make sure it's cycling the way it should be.
  • Learn JavaScript's prototype object pattern and re-implement everything in that in place of the closure pattern I've been using; I'll want to bite that bullet before this thing goes much farther
  • Add Control, Bag, and Stack components
  • Add ability to spawn new entities within simulation, attach first to Bag component, later to split component for BPMN
  • Expand function of Process components to handle multiple entities in parallel, in effect making a single component function as if it were multiple, associated ones (similar to bag?)
  • Discrete-event simulation frameworks often include the concept of sets (logical containers that that be iterated and compared for intersection and so on, so that idea should be implemented; this would expand on things were doing now with lists of components and entities; the need for this was inspired by thinking about the bag data structure in general
  • Implement a combined Queue-Process component
  • Expand Path component representation so it can incorporate multiple line segments
  • Add ability to sense reaching tail end of FIFO queue based on stopping to wait on a Path component; collect statistics accordingly (possibly add wait flag to entities so they can test against the next entity in line)
  • Look into creating a zero-duration, zero-queue decision component
  • Create standardized routing mechanism (to components of different types) based on process logic (vs. distribution logic to multiple components of the same type)
  • Add a test to verify that valid routes exist to support all required paths that may be taken by different types of entities.
  • Add a test to automatically assign downstream distribution mechanisms. See if the need for this isn't actually obviated at some point.
  • Implement mechanism to identify combinations of related components into groups (e.g., a group of tollbooths represent a single toll plaza)
  • Gather and report system-, component-, and group-level statistics
  • Add ability to stream large volumes of output information which can be post-processed and quantified via a parsing mechanism; this is necessary for advanced statistical characterization
  • Streamline the process of defining the endpoints of Path components (i.e., attach standard nodes to other components and connect to those automatically, which will greatly save on the number of x,y locations the designer must specify manually)
  • Add an edit mode that allows designers to change component properties interactively (ultimately including being able to drag them)
  • Use the new, completely external mechanism for displaying component data
  • Describe how abstract representation can be used to represent detailed layouts and interactions; include ability to flag or alarm situations which would cause conflicts in the real world that would not necessarily be captured in a model unless specifically tested for
  • Add the ability to graph outputs as part of reporting
  • Add scrolling, animated graphs to illustrate progress as simulations run
  • Include ability for users to call up component and entity status by written or graphical display interactively while runs are in progress
  • Create streamlined graphical representations of all component types; create data display for Path components
  • Add ability to display entities inside relevant non-path components
  • Abstract the current x,y locations of all elements and scale them to the screen so the user can zoom in and out
  • Employ three.js framework to render models in 3D. Also consider piping this output through the associated VR framework.
  • Improve how type is displayed for 2D entities
  • Improve how status is displayed for 2D entities
  • Modify 3D entities to reflect entity type as well as status
  • Add ability for users to interactively change things during runs
  • Add Monte Carlo mechanisms to various timing and routing events (beyond what's already been demonstrated)
  • Allow designer to build Monte Carlo and other distributions from acquired data using standardized tools
  • Incorporate Monte Carlo dithering or explicit curve shape for distributions
  • Add ability to perform multiple runs and statistically quantify generated outputs
  • Make simulation display update at regular intervals of simulated time rather than intervals defined by individual events; also make this "speed" scalable
  • Include ability to add arbitrary graphic elements to models (labels, keys, tables, etc.)
  • Include ability to display an underlay "below" the model display (e.g., a floor plan of a modeled process)
  • Allow user to turn off display and run model in "fire-and-forget" mode where it generates results without wasting time redrawing graphics.
  • Allow user to selectively turn different display elements on and off
  • Create suite of test configurations to exercise every combination of connections and support regression testing.
  • Add ability to assign open/close schedules for components and groups
  • Add ability to introduce multiple types of entities in model with different processing rules for routing and timing
  • Add ability to combine multiple queues into a single, logical unit
  • Add ability to adapt standard base components to represent varied and specialized things (this applies mostly to Process components)
  • Add ability to save and restore model definitions (in files/XML and in databases, requires PHP/MySql, Node.js or other back end capability)
  • Add ability to represent more abstract processes:
    • Reintroduce wait..until mechanism that uses the current events queue
    • Include pools of resources that are needed by different processes
    • Implement non-FIFO queues or collections that receive and forward entities based on arbitrary (user-defined) criteria
    • Include ability to accept events that happen according to fixed schedules rather than random ones (e.g., to match observed data)
    • Include the ability to change representation of entities and components to represent state changes (by color, shape, labels, flags, etc.)
    • Support input and editing of modular packages of information used to define and drive models
    • Add ability to represent BPM processes using standard BPMN notation
  • Really complex stuff
    • Develop more complex, arbitrary node-and-link representation of model, which brings up worlds of complications on its own!
    • Polish related sections of code and break them into modules which can be included on a modular basis
    • Make modules and examples distributable for use by a wider community
    • Make entities be active rather than passive, retain some intelligence in the components
      • Write documentation for modules as needed
      • Share on GitHub
      • Create dedicated project page on my website
      • Update and enhance my custom Graph component as well as the simulation framework
  • Re-implement this system in a more appropriate language like C++ or at least Java

CC0 if possible, else Creative Commons License CC Attribution 4.0. Full statement here.
Rights to third party linked and referenced materials are assumed to be held by their respective owners.